This page uses opencode/kimi-k2.5 as the comparison baseline. Every chart and table below is intended to answer the same question: where this model leads, where it lags, and what it costs in quality, time, and request pressure.
These charts use opencode/kimi-k2.5 as zero. Positive bars mean other models are above the baseline on that metric; negative bars mean they trail it.
Use this to decide whether another model beats opencode/kimi-k2.5 enough to justify the change.
| Model | Composite | Delta vs baseline | Success | Success delta | ORPT | ORPT delta | Cost | Cost delta | Wall time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| opencode/gpt-5.4-nano | 0.789 | +0.005 | 85% | -4% | 15.17 | +0.92 | $0.4215 | -$0.4907 | 27m 33s |
| opencode/kimi-k2.5 Baseline | 0.785 | +0.0 | 89% | +0% | 14.25 | +0.00 | $0.9122 | +$0.0000 | 41m 05s |
| opencode/claude-opus-4-6 | 0.67 | -0.114 | 89% | +0% | 14.88 | +0.63 | $21.8757 | +$20.9634 | 40m 04s |
| opencode/glm-5 | 0.623 | -0.162 | 78% | -11% | 11.57 | -2.68 | $6.4339 | +$5.5217 | 20m 10s |
| opencode/big-pickle | 0.615 | -0.169 | 67% | -22% | 15.39 | +1.14 | $0.0000 | -$0.9122 | 36m 28s |
| opencode/gpt-5.4 | 0.609 | -0.176 | 78% | -11% | 11.00 | -3.25 | $8.9827 | +$8.0705 | 32m 47s |
| opencode/claude-sonnet-4-6 | 0.593 | -0.192 | 78% | -11% | 16.43 | +2.18 | $11.8406 | +$10.9283 | 42m 31s |
| opencode/glm-5.1 | 0.547 | -0.238 | 67% | -22% | 12.06 | -2.19 | $1.8816 | +$0.9694 | 64m 39s |
| opencode/minimax-m2.5 | 0.481 | -0.304 | 56% | -33% | 18.87 | +4.62 | $0.6413 | -$0.2710 | 32m 15s |
| opencode/gpt-5.4-mini | 0.425 | -0.36 | 48% | -41% | 9.54 | -4.71 | $1.0606 | +$0.1484 | 21m 48s |
| opencode/minimax-m2.5-free | 0.415 | -0.37 | 59% | -30% | 16.19 | +1.94 | $0.0000 | -$0.9122 | 41m 34s |
| opencode/gemini-3-flash | 0.415 | -0.37 | 59% | -30% | 21.81 | +7.56 | $2.4307 | +$1.5184 | 62m 52s |
| opencode/gemini-3.1-pro | 0.291 | -0.494 | 37% | -52% | 12.70 | -1.55 | $5.8536 | +$4.9414 | 51m 25s |
| opencode/nemotron-3-super-free | 0.181 | -0.603 | 26% | -63% | 19.43 | +5.18 | $0.0000 | -$0.9122 | 109m 00s |
This table puts the most revealing tasks first: unsolved tasks, single-solver tasks, and tasks where the baseline trails the winner by a meaningful margin.
| Task | Field read | Baseline result | Winner | Gap to winner | Baseline cost | Baseline time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workspace transplant bundle repair | Competitive split | dnf | opencode/big-pickle 0.985 |
0.985 | n/a | 5m 00s |
| RHEL edge firewalld router repair | Competitive split | failed | opencode/gpt-5.4-nano 0.953 |
0.953 | $0.0198 | 43s |
| Log audit shell script | Competitive split | dnf | opencode/gpt-5.4-nano 0.935 |
0.935 | n/a | 1m 15s |
| K3s registry mirror trust repair | Competitive split | passed | opencode/big-pickle 1.0 |
0.208 | $0.0306 | 1m 04s |
| RHEL k3s node preparation repair | Competitive split | passed | opencode/gpt-5.4-nano 1.0 |
0.202 | $0.0612 | 2m 26s |
| nftables router ingress repair | Competitive split | passed | opencode/gpt-5.4-nano 0.98 |
0.187 | $0.0369 | 1m 21s |
| Kubernetes rollout repair | Clear separation | passed | opencode/gpt-5.4-mini 1.0 |
0.177 | $0.0495 | 2m 12s |
| Event status shell summary | Competitive split | passed | opencode/big-pickle 1.0 |
0.14 | $0.0205 | 37s |
| Docker Compose observability fix | Competitive split | passed | opencode/gpt-5.4-nano 0.975 |
0.139 | $0.0897 | 5m 00s |
| Build workspace plane convergence | Competitive split | passed | opencode/gpt-5.4-nano 0.942 |
0.124 | $0.0519 | 1m 29s |
| CNPG restore manifest repair | Competitive split | passed | opencode/big-pickle 0.964 |
0.09 | $0.0261 | 54s |
| MCP OpenBao contract repair | Competitive split | passed | opencode/big-pickle 0.954 |
0.08 | $0.0328 | 50s |
| RHEL NetworkManager bridge VLAN repair | Competitive split | passed | opencode/gpt-5.4-nano 0.951 |
0.08 | $0.0248 | 50s |
| MetalLB ingress address pool repair | Competitive split | passed | opencode/gpt-5.4-nano 0.928 |
0.078 | $0.0428 | 1m 38s |
| GitOps workspace render validation | Competitive split | passed | opencode/big-pickle 0.941 |
0.078 | $0.0347 | 1m 09s |
| Pre-ArgoCD bootstrap sequencing | Competitive split | passed | opencode/gpt-5.4-nano 0.967 |
0.073 | $0.0420 | 2m 59s |
| Log level rollup shell script | Competitive split | passed | opencode/big-pickle 0.965 |
0.072 | $0.0223 | 36s |
| Kubernetes OIDC RBAC repair | Competitive split | passed | opencode/gpt-5.4-nano 0.95 |
0.066 | $0.0380 | 1m 12s |
| AppArmor dnsmasq profile repair | Competitive split | passed | opencode/gpt-5.4-nano 0.918 |
0.058 | $0.0377 | 1m 37s |
| Workspace runtime access convergence | Competitive split | passed | opencode/gpt-5.4-nano 0.932 |
0.047 | $0.0633 | 1m 42s |
| Ansible nginx role completion | Competitive split | passed | opencode/big-pickle 0.963 |
0.045 | $0.0200 | 52s |
| SELinux registry volume label repair | Clear separation | passed | opencode/kimi-k2.5 1.0 |
0.0 | $0.0254 | 42s |
| Terraform static site repair | Competitive split | passed | opencode/kimi-k2.5 0.978 |
0.0 | $0.0152 | 41s |
| Bootstrap phase validation repair | Competitive split | passed | opencode/kimi-k2.5 0.993 |
0.0 | $0.0380 | 1m 30s |
| ExternalDNS RFC2136 repair | Competitive split | passed | opencode/kimi-k2.5 0.982 |
0.0 | $0.0299 | 46s |
| Traefik forwarded header trust repair | Competitive split | passed | opencode/kimi-k2.5 0.913 |
0.0 | $0.0331 | 1m 01s |
| Wildcard TLS route coverage | Competitive split | passed | opencode/kimi-k2.5 0.929 |
0.0 | $0.0262 | 1m 00s |
Pairwise task wins and top-line deltas show whether a challenger truly beats the baseline or just looks cheaper or faster in isolation.
| Challenger | Task record | Composite edge | Success edge | Cost edge | Time edge | ORPT edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| opencode/nemotron-3-super-free | 24-1 2 ties |
+0.603 | +63% | +$0.9122 | -67m 56s | -5.18 |
| opencode/gemini-3.1-pro | 24-1 2 ties |
+0.494 | +52% | -$4.9414 | -10m 20s | +1.55 |
| opencode/minimax-m2.5-free | 24-1 2 ties |
+0.37 | +30% | +$0.9122 | -29s | -1.94 |
| opencode/gemini-3-flash | 24-2 1 ties |
+0.37 | +30% | -$1.5184 | -21m 47s | -7.56 |
| opencode/gpt-5.4-mini | 19-7 1 ties |
+0.36 | +41% | -$0.1484 | +19m 16s | +4.71 |
| opencode/minimax-m2.5 | 18-8 1 ties |
+0.304 | +33% | +$0.2710 | +8m 50s | -4.62 |
| opencode/glm-5.1 | 23-2 2 ties |
+0.238 | +22% | -$0.9694 | -23m 35s | +2.19 |
| opencode/claude-sonnet-4-6 | 24-3 0 ties |
+0.192 | +11% | -$10.9283 | -1m 26s | -2.18 |
| opencode/gpt-5.4 | 24-2 1 ties |
+0.176 | +11% | -$8.0705 | +8m 17s | +3.25 |
| opencode/big-pickle | 12-14 1 ties |
+0.169 | +22% | +$0.9122 | +4m 36s | -1.14 |
| opencode/glm-5 | 23-4 0 ties |
+0.162 | +11% | -$5.5217 | +20m 54s | +2.68 |
| opencode/claude-opus-4-6 | 24-3 0 ties |
+0.114 | +0% | -$20.9634 | +1m 00s | -0.63 |
| opencode/gpt-5.4-nano | 8-19 0 ties |
-0.005 | +4% | +$0.4907 | +13m 32s | -0.92 |
The benchmark result only matters in context: this section pairs the observed benchmark outcome with the catalog metadata and operating characteristics behind it.
Primary blended price derived automatically from OpenRouter listing moonshotai/kimi-k2.5 using a 3:1 input:output blend.